The evaluation and selection process will follow open, transparent and merit-based procedures to ensure that all applications are evaluated in a competent and impartial manner. Standard evaluation criteria and scoring will be used. More information about the process, evaluation criteria and scoring can be read in the sections below.
STAGE 1
STAGE 2
STAGE 3
STAGE 4
Excellence | Impact | Implementation |
---|---|---|
Weighting: 50% | Weighting: 30% | Weighting: 20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 | The proposal fails to address the criterion or cannot be assessed due to missing or incomplete information |
---|---|
1 | Poor. The criterion is inadequately addressed, or there are serious inherent weaknesses. |
2 | Fair. Proposal broadly addresses the criterion, but there are significant weaknesses. |
3 | Good. Proposal addresses the criterion well, but a number of shortcomings are present. |
4 | Very good. Proposal addresses the criterion very well, but a small number of shortcomings are present. |
5 | Excellent. Proposal successfully addresses all relevant aspects of the criterion. Any shortcomings are minor. |